Friday, September 21, 2012

Wikipedia Worksheet


Wikipedia Reliability Worksheet
Article title: Ballet
Answer the following questions to see how reliable a Wikipedia article is.
  1. Start with the main page. Does it have any cleanup banners that have been placed there to indicate problems with the article? (A complete list is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages/
    Cleanup
    .)
Any one of the following cleanup banners means the article is an unreliable source:
This article or section has multiple issues.
NA
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
 NA
The neutrality of this article is disputed.
 NA
The factual accuracy of this article is disputed.
 NA
This needs copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling.
 NA
This may contain material not appropriate for an encyclopedia.
 NA
This article only describes one highly specialized aspect of its associated subject.
 NA
This article requires authentication or verification by an expert.
 NA
This article or section needs to be updated.
 NA
This article may not provide balanced geographical coverage on a region.
 NA
This is missing citations or needs footnotes.
 NA
This article does not cite any references or sources.
 NA
  1. Read through the article and see if it meets the following requirements:
Is it written in a clear and organized way?
Yes    
Is the tone neutral (not taking sides)?
 Yes
Are all important facts referenced (you're told where they come from)?
 Yes
 Does the information provided seem complete or does it look like there are gaps (or just one side of the story)?
Complete

  1. Scroll down to the article's References and open them in new windows or tabs. Do they seem like reliable sources? (For help in determining the general reliability of a source, check out the Knowing What's What and What's Note: The 5 Ws (and 1 "H") of Cyberspace handout.)

    Reliable references:

    All references I followed were reliable. They were all books, some I have read or used on previous papers for my dance classes I took at my former university.

    Possibly unreliable references:



    Definitely unreliable references:



     
  1. Click on the Discussion tab. How is the article rated on the Rating Scale(Stub, Start, C, B, GA, A, FA)? What issues around the article are being discussed? Do any of them make you doubt the article's reliability?

This article received a B on the rating scale. No one doubts the reliability of the article that I see. The

issues people have with the article, is that they would like more detail and more explanation, on what

the article states about ballet


  1. Based on the above questions, give the article an overall ranking of ReliablePartially Reliable or Unreliable.
  • You may use a Reliable article as a source (but remember that even if a Wikipedia article is reliable, it should never be your only source on a topic!)
  • You may use a Partially Reliable article as a starting point for your research, and may use some of its references as sources, but do not use it as a source.
  • You should not use an Unreliable article as a source or a starting point. Research the same topic in a different encyclopedia.
How did you rank this article (Reliable, Partially Reliable or Unreliable)? Give at least three reasons to support
your answer.

I agree with a B rating for this article. I think this article is reliable, but lacks some important definitions.


As a dancer, I understand the terminology, but if I were not a dancer this article would be slightly


 confusing and at times it would feel like it is almost contradicting itself. This article still needs to be expanded on. _____________________________________________________________________
  

USERS:

1. Lambtron 
This is someone who I looked at who I feel is a reliable source. He is very interested in the topic and he is a photographer for theater and dance. 

2. Robertgreer
I found this user is not available to  respond or post about his interest or why he has commented, but he is not an anonymous user and he has left his email and address to get in contact with him. 

3. Crazy-Dancing
This is the most relaible source of the three. This user is a member of the Ballet Wiki-project. 

1 comment:

  1. Isn't interesting to find out who the people who are editing the page are!? It could be a good way to network with others in your field of interest!

    ReplyDelete