
Webquest Website!!
Webquest Example

Beginning
|
Developing
|
Accomplished
|
Score
|
|
Overall
Aesthetics (This refers to the
WebQuest page itself, not the external resources linked to it.)
|
||||
Overall Visual Appeal
|
0 points
There are few or no
graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography.
OR
Color is garish
and/or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background
interferes with the readability.
|
2 points
Graphic elements
sometimes, but not always, contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas
and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.
|
4 points
Appropriate and
thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute
to the understanding of concepts, ideas and relationships. Differences in
type size and/or color are used well and consistently.
|
4
The webquest is appealing to the eyes and also teaches you
while you are looking.
|
Navigation & Flow
|
0 points
Getting through the
lesson is confusing and unconventional. Pages can't be found easily and/or
the way back isn't clear.
|
2 points
There are a few
places where the learner can get lost and not know where to go next.
|
4 points
Navigation is
seamless. It is always clear to the learner what all the pieces are and how
to get to them.
|
2
There is no real
direction on what to do once you have followed some of the links, but there
is good order to the processes.
|
Mechanical Aspects
|
0 points
There are more than
5 broken links, misplaced or missing images, badly sized tables, misspellings
and/or grammatical errors.
|
1 point
There are some
broken links, misplaced or missing images, badly sized tables, misspellings
and/or grammatical errors.
|
2 points
No mechanical
problems noted.
|
2
I did not find any mechanical problems.
|
Introduction
|
||||
Motivational Effectiveness of Introduction
|
0 points
The introduction is
purely factual, with no appeal to relevance or social importance
OR
The scenario posed
is transparently bogus and doesn't respect the media literacy of today's
learners.
|
1 point
The introduction
relates somewhat to the learner's interests and/or describes a compelling
question or problem.
|
2 points
The introduction
draws the reader into the lesson by relating to the learner's interests or
goals and/or engagingly describing a compelling question or problem.
|
2
For my personally I love lessons where you can relate it
directly to the students life or how they compare to the what we are
learning, this web quest drew me in and hopefully would draw in the students
as well.
|
Cognitive Effectiveness of the Introduction
|
0 points
The introduction
doesn't prepare the reader for what is to come, or build on what the learner
already knows.
|
1 point
The introduction
makes some reference to learner's prior knowledge and previews to some extent
what the lesson is about.
|
2 points
The introduction
builds on learner's prior knowledge and effectively prepares the learner by
foreshadowing what the lesson is about.
|
2
The introduction clearly tells students what they will be
learning, however it does not leave much room for students to explore, this
lesson is jammed full of information.
|
Task (The task is the end result of student efforts... not the
steps involved in getting there.)
|
||||
Connection of Task to Standards
|
0 points
The task is not
related to standards.
|
2 point
The task is
referenced to standards but is not clearly connected to what students must
know and be able to do to achieve proficiency of those standards.
|
4 points
The task is
referenced to standards and is clearly connected to what students must know
and be able to do to achieve proficiency of those standards.
|
4
When looking just at the end product this lesson is
directly connected and very well laid out, but the process seemed a little
boring and hopefully with some of my changes, it will be more eciting!
|
Cognitive Level of the Task
|
0 points
Task requires
simply comprehending or retelling of information found on web pages and
answering factual questions.
|
3 points
Task is doable but
is limited in its significance to students' lives. The task requires analysis
of information and/or putting together information from several sources.
|
6 points
Task is doable and
engaging, and elicits thinking that goes beyond rote comprehension. The task
requires synthesis of multiple sources of information, and/or taking a position,
and/or going beyond the data given and making a generalization or creative
product.
|
3
This task is definitely doable but it does not sound super
exciting. I made changes that will hopefully make this lesson better.
|
Process (The process is the step-by-step description of how
students will accomplish the task.)
|
||||
Clarity of Process
|
0 points
Process is not
clearly stated. Students would not know exactly what they were supposed to do
just from reading this.
|
2 points
Some directions are
given, but there is missing information. Students might be confused.
|
4 points
Every step is
clearly stated. Most students would know exactly where they are at each step
of the process and know what to do next.
|
2
Some of the directions once you follow the links on the
web quest have no directions.
|
Scaffolding of Process
|
0 points
The process lacks
strategies and organizational tools needed for students to gain the knowledge
needed to complete the task.
Activities are of
little significance to one another and/or to the accomplishment of the task.
|
3 points
Strategies and
organizational tools embedded in the process are insufficient to ensure that
all students will gain the knowledge needed to complete the task.
Some of the
activities do not relate specifically to the accomplishment of the task.
|
6 points
The process
provides students coming in at different entry levels with strategies and
organizational tools to access and gain the knowledge needed to complete the
task.
Activities are
clearly related and designed to take the students from basic knowledge to
higher level thinking.
Checks for
understanding are built in to assess whether students are getting it. See:
|
6
There several
different uses of teaching that will be used in this lesson, this will make
reaching each student hopefully easier.
|
Richness of Process
|
0 points
Few steps, no
separate roles assigned.
|
1 points
Some separate tasks
or roles assigned. More complex activities required.
|
2 points
Different roles are
assigned to help students understand different perspectives and/or share
responsibility in accomplishing the task.
|
2
There are a lot of different styles of learning being
used.
|
Resources (Note: you should evaluate all resources linked to the
page, even if they are in sections other than the Process block. Also note
that books, video and other off-line resources can and should be used where
appropriate.)
|
||||
Relevance & Quantity of Resources
|
0 points
Resources provided
are not sufficient for students to accomplish the task.
OR
There are too many
resources for learners to look at in a reasonable time.
|
2 point
There is some
connection between the resources and the information needed for students to
accomplish the task. Some resources don't add anything new.
|
4 points
There is a clear
and meaningful connection between all the resources and the information
needed for students to accomplish the task. Every resource carries its
weight.
|
4
All the links were exactly as they were described and they
all directly connect to the assignment.
|
Quality of
Resources |
0 points
Links are mundane.
They lead to information that could be found in a classroom encyclopedia.
|
2 points
Some links carry
information not ordinarily found in a classroom.
|
4 points
Links make
excellent use of the Web's timeliness and colorfulness.
Varied resources
provide enough meaningful information for students to think deeply.
|
4
In this they use an online quiz game, a youtube video, and
other websites as well.
|
Evaluation
|
||||
Clarity of Evaluation Criteria
|
0 points
Criteria for
success are not described.
|
3 points
Criteria for
success are at least partially described.
|
6 points
Criteria for
success are clearly stated in the form of a rubric. Criteria include
qualitative as well as quantitative descriptors.
The evaluation
instrument clearly measures what students must know and be able to do to
accomplish the task.
|
6
The criteria is very clearly and nicely laid out.
|
Total
Score
|
/50
|
|||
